Yesterday, as I was reading the article "Synchrotron
worked for the right reasons"(1) I began to shake my head in
realizing the linear thinking skills of his author, Dwight Percy.
Percy is very excited about the economic spinoffs of the building of
the Synchrotron in Saskatoon, and defended the project as "...the
right thing to do..." Here we go again with this obtuse economic
philosophy of making the hard decisions(2) based on the choice of
what is right versus what is wrong(3). The major problems with the
decision of building the Synchrotron is that its connection with our
overall educational needs have not been understood by the
politicians and that its operational costs have not been identified
yet(4). Because of these problems, the decision to build the
Synchrotron just prior to election time is tainted by political
motivation, and therefore this decision to build the Synchrotron is
not the right thing to do now when our universities are
contemplating substantial increases in tuition fees.
Percy defends the project because of the educational challenges
our children will have once the Synchrotron is fully operational in
year 2008. He says "...What an incredible opportunity for my 12-year
old!..." Percy forgets that this Synchrotron, per se, cannot provide
the relevant economic relationship between education and work which
is so much needed in Saskatchewan. Therefore, the Synchrotron is an
expensive educational accessory for the benefit of few privileged
children(5) and to the detriment of all others. This is not a
democratic and compassionate outlook of education; it is an outlook
which will further divide the rich from the poor, cities from the
country, non natives from natives. Premier Romanow claims to lead by
consensus, the truth is that his dictatorial(6), lack of
creativity(7), and opportunistic political ambitions drive further
divisions among Saskatchewan people.
Endnotes
1. Synchrotron worked for the right reasons, by Dwight Percy, The
StarPhoenix, April 3, 1999, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
2. The current management philosophy of our leaders is so archaic
that they still define the manager as the leader who makes the big
buck to i)make the hard decisions, and ii)get the job done through
others. I wonder what kind of hard decisions this manager can make
under an autocratic environment and what kind of human sensitivity
this same manager must have in making sure to exploit the work of
others for his/her credit. Refer to the series of Mario deSantis'
articles on the NEED OF TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGES IN SASKATCHEWAN
published in the Fall of 1998 in the North Central Internet News
3. Refer to the series of Mario deSantis' articles on the Systems
Dynamics published in February/March 1999 in the North Central
Internet News
4. Some fear synchrotron project may drain university finances,
by Kim McNairn, The StarPhoenix, April 1, 1999, Saskatoon,
Saskatchewan.
5. Thoughts on Education, Knowledge, Learning and the Internet,
by Mario deSantis, January 23, 1999. Published in the North Central
Internet News
6. Saskatchewan Tin Pot Dictatorships: Lack of Integrity is Lack
of Leadership, by Mario deSantis, February 7, 1999. Published in the
North Central Internet News
7. A short commentary on the budget: A Number Game, by Mario
deSantis, April 1, 1999. Published in the North Central Internet
News |