Working together to build healthier
communities means striving to achieve our sense of individual and
collective freedom. It means feeling free to express ourselves in
our work, in our home, in our communities, and therefore we can feel
free only if we get along with our neighbours. So, having healthier
communities means getting along and feeling free together in our
communities. And, we cannot build healthier communities unless we
are healthy ourselves, with our bodies, with our minds and with our
actions. This concept of being healthy is a universal concept and we
embraced it, with difficulties, when Louise Simard, former Minister
of Health, launched the Wellness model of health for building
healthier communities. Her "A Saskatchewan Vision for Health(1)" was
a masterpiece of conceptual understanding on how we should strive
all together to build healthier communities and how we should
re-conceptualize the provision of health services within this broad
understanding of the Wellness model of health.
Let me not go through Simard's vision of
health, let me just say that her vision was a paper vision, a vision
enforced by legislation, and a vision executed autocratically by our
government, our bureaucracy and our Tin Pot dictators of any
political colour and business affiliation. The main paper goal of
Simard's vision was to give back the responsibility for our health
to our communities through the formation of health districts;
instead, our health has been dictated more than ever from the ivory
towers of the government and of the Saskatchewan Association of
Health Organizations (SAHO). Simard's vision was put in paper
because our leaders didn't have any vision, the only vision they
have is not for building healthier communities but to supposedly
save money and constrain our freedom to build healthier communities.
This is the paradox of our leaders, they
put on paper our vision because they cannot express it with their
walks, with their talks, with their hearts, and with their actions.
Our leaders don't have a vision, their main objective is to save
money against creating wealth, to build a Synchrotron rather than
provide needed education for our children, to create additional
layers of bureaucracy rather than furthering our imagination for
working more creatively, to downsize people rather than assisting
their families, to increase the wealth of our global corporations
rather than diversify our economy. In short, our inept leaders are
not working for building healthier communities, they work with the
numbers provided by the research work of our bean counters,
statisticians, economists, academicians and other eminent Big
Brains; and in doing so they have created a world for the few and
privileged, a world where people are divided, alienated and unable
to express themselves.
This government is not pursuing the
democratic goal to enrich our communities and create wealth. This
government has the overall drive to save money at any cost because
they have no imagination, their Big Brains are so full of numbers
that these numbers spill all over the place, on TV, on the radio,
even in the bedrooms of our politicians. I tell you something, all
these numbers should be flushed out into our sewage system so that
our Big Brains can start thinking again and make sense of whatever
they say.
I have followed the later discussions about
the regionalization or amalgamation of local governments(2) and I
have read the recent article "SARM critic merits attention(3)" by
Murray Mandryk. In this article, Mandryk refers to the brief
submitted by Fred Sutter to the Garcea's panel on municipal renewal,
and he tosses so many numbers to make your brain spin. All these
numbers centre on a municipal model that combines nine Rural
Municipalities (RMs) and six villages in southwest Saskatchewan.
Again, the bottom line for describing this municipal model is not
for creating wealth and healthier communities but for saving money.
Now we know how the Wellness model worked
for health care, it worked so well that the government turned health
care to a gambling casino(4). Do we really want another casino in
Saskatchewan and legislate the new Municipal model of government?
Yes, but only yes "IF the people directly involved decide that is
what they want to do! IF local citizens feel comfortable with all
forms of government moving further away from them... IF we heard the
government had been lobbied by our local councillors to force
amalgamation of RMs(5)" With this government there is no IF, just a
bunch of statistical numbers spin-doctored by our consulting
experts. This is not democracy, this is not building healthier
communities, and this is not saving money either Honourable Premier
Romanow!
Endnotes
Quote by Donella Meadows "challenging a
paradigm is not a part-time job. It is not sufficient to make your
point once and then blame the world for not getting it. The world
has a vested interest in, a commitment to, not getting it. The point
has to be made patiently and repeatedly, day after day after day"
ftp://sysdyn.mit.edu/ftp/sdep/Roadmaps/RM1/D-4143-1.pdf
http://iisd1.iisd.ca/pcdf/meadows/default.htm
General reference: Articles by Mario
deSantis published by North Central Internet News
1. A Saskatchewan Vision for Health, The
Honourable Louise Simard, Minister of Health, Saskatchewan Health,
August 1992
2. Replace local government with economic
regions: report, CBC Saskatchewan,http://sask.cbc.ca/ Web Posted |
Mar 20 2000 8:46 PM
3. SARM critic merits attention, by Murray
Mandryk, The StarPhoenix, March 15, 2000, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
4. Pat Atkinson: raising the finger and
turning healthcare to a gambling casino, by Mario deSantis, February
3, 2000
5. Government Is Putting It's Agenda
Forward, by Edwin Wallace, January 29, 2000
|