We have been writing a bit about no-fault insurance and the related
abuses of overspending, of human rights infringements, of academic
corruption and of governmental ineptitude and parochialism. In
reading the article "Tainted-blood lawyers get $35 million(1)" I
came across the word no-fault and I became incensed again.
I see this no-fault buzz word as a gimmick by some corporate and
governmental agencies to suppress the natural recourse for people to
seek remedies against the wrongs they have been subjected. In two
recent court rulings in Ontario and British Columbia, hepatitis C
class-action lawyers were awarded $35 million, and as a consequence
hepatitis C victim Mike McCarthy commented his disappointment by
saying that "money will go into lawyers' bank accounts, instead of
into a no-fault compensation government scheme that could have been
used to help all victims."
I am certainly sympathetic with MacCarthy's desire to see that
more money would go to help the victims rather than into the
lawyers' bank accounts. However, MacCarthy's must recognize that the
class actions carried forward by the lawyers were instrumental for
helping the many thousands of tainted-blood victims to receive
compensation. Also, MacCarthy must recognize that the current
disheartening economic roles of governments(2)(3) and corporate
culture(4) could not have been conducive to provide hepatitis C
victims with a better compensation without the launching of legal
class actions(5).
In Saskatchewan, the public review of no-fault insurance has
brought to light the infringements of human rights and related
damages to the no-fault victims(6). Such victims have no practical
legal recourse since the Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission
created by Premier Roy Romanow is a governmental self serving
agency(7), and since Saskatchewan people are not allowed to pursue
legal remedies by using the tools of class actions or contingency
fees(8). The only recourse of these no-fault victims is a political
one(9) and their hope for changing the present no-fault insurance
legislation is getting better with the stunning rejection of this
government's policies in last Monday's by-election in Wood
River(10). Finally, a breeze of fresh air is caressing the province
for both our no-fault victims and the rest of us.
References & Endnotes
We must break down Premier Roy Romanow's myth that the system is
more worth than individual rights. The law and order mentality of
our justice system for protecting the individual rights of
Saskatchewan people can be summarized by Serge Kujawa's statement
made back in 1991 "It doesn't matter if Milgaard is innocent... The
whole judicial system is at issue-it's worth more than one person."
Serge Kujawa is a former prosecutor and colleague of Premier Roy
Romanow.
General reference: Articles by Mario deSantis published by Ensign
1. Tainted-blood lawyers get $35 million, by Mark Kennedy, The
StarPhoenix, June 26, 2000, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
2. Governmental coalition in Saskatchewan: a private contractual
deal at the expense of the electorate? By Mario deSantis, October 2,
1999
3. Governments must stop serving themselves and their friends, by
Mario deSantis, February 13, 2000
4. Our leaders can't recognize an asset from a hole in the
ground, by Mario deSantis, December 2, 1999
5. A class action is a legal procedure to hold corporate and
governmental wrongdoers accountable for the damages they have caused
to a number of individuals. Class actions are pursued when the cost
of prosecution of individual claims is beyond the means of the
individual. http://consumerlawpage.com/
6. Coalition Against No Fault In Saskatchewan. Transcripts Of Our
First Meeting In Regina! http://www.angelfire.com/nf/coalitionagainstnf/library1.htm
Transcripts Of Our Second Meeting In Saskatoon! http://www.angelfire.com/nf/coalitionagainstnf/nofault.pdf
7. Our Phony Government: preaching human rights while breaking
the law, by Mario deSantis, June 22, 2000
8. Contingency fees, or percentage fees, are paid at the
conclusion of a legal case, and only if there is a recovery. Lawyers
who work on a contingency fee carry a higher financial risk and
therefore they take strong cases and expect higher compensations.
The contingency fee is the average person's only way to hire a
lawyer and for that reason major corporations, insurance companies
and governments have worked hard to limit contingency fees in order
to limit the ability of the public to assert its legal rights.
http://consumerlawpage.com/article/legalfee.shtml Turning lawyers
into gamblers is a bad bet, by Allan Hutchinson, The Globe and Mail,
June 7, 2000 http://www.globeandmail.ca/gam/Commentary/20000607/COHUTCH.html
Case for contingency fees, by Douglas Lennox, letter to the editor,
The Globe and Mail, June 9, 2000 http://www.globeandmail.ca/gam/Letters/20000609/FRLETS-9.html
9. No-Fault is not an administrative matter, it is a political
matter, it affects all of us, by Mario deSantis, June 9, 2000
10. Sask. Party crushes NDP and Liberals, in byelection, CBC
Saskatchewan, http://www.sask.cbc.ca Web Posted | Jun 28 2000 1:25
PM EDT
|