I read the article "Proper way to challenge study: more research(1)"
by Dr. Barry McLennan, and I laughed at this professional
researcher's conclusion that Dr. David Cassidy's study(2) on the
merit of no-fault insurance should be challenged with more
researches conducted in a logical and scientific manner rather than
through the emotions of people.
Dr. McLennan's article is a reflection of a reductionist mind set
whereby good research people are blamed for the systemic faults of
the system, reprimanded, removed from office and replaced with new
researchers who take the roles of principal investigators and
principal manipulators of their subordinates and of their
statistical data. Statistics is not comprised solely of the
manipulation of numbers, but it includes the stories and the
emotions of people behind these numbers(3).
In SGI's no-fault insurance program we have injured victims who
have claimed to have been under surveillance for years by SGI's
investigators, and we have injured victims who have claimed that
their health conditions were reassessed without any further medical
evidence. The discretional reassessments of the health conditions of
the claimants made by SGI's adjusters remind me of the phony paper
medical reviews undertaken by the State Farm Insurance company in
the United States(4). And whenever concerns for the infringements of
privacy rights by SGI's investigators were reported to the police,
the same police said that they could not help because the
surveillance was ordered by the government(5). And the many
allegations raised by injured claimants that SGI's adjusters were
lying to them, prompted claimant Ken Hidlebaugh, a policeman in
Prince Albert, to recommend the use of a tape recorder while talking
to SGI's adjusters(6).
I don't agree with Dr. McLennan's contention to have further
expensive researches, here in Saskatchewan, about the merit of
no-fault insurance. We cannot have further researches on no-fault
insurance whenever we have widespread allegations of administrative
wrongdoings and violations of privacy rights by our authorities, our
crown corporations and our academic institutions. No-fault insurance
is not a research matter anymore, it has become a political matter
affecting all of us(7). The future of our province is not in further
phony researches, instead, the future of our province is in the
education and integral upbringing of our children.
About the author: Mario deSantis is an Educator and Economist and
many of his articles have been published in the journal Ensign
http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/
Note: this article was published by The StarPhoenix of
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
References
1. Proper way to challenge study: more research, by Dr. Barry
McLennan, The StarPhoenix, June 30, 2000, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
(The text of his comments)
2. The incredible abuse of Saskatchewan No-Fault insurance, by
Mario deSantis and reviewed by James deSantis, May 28, 2000
3. PUBLIC REVIEWS OF NO-FAULT INSURANCE IN SASKATCHEWAN, 2000
Spring meetings in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert. Coalition
Against No Fault Insurance http://www.angelfire.com/nf/coalitionagainstnf/
4. Investigation of State Farm Insurance and paper medical
review, Dateline, NBC, June 23, 2000; Burrelle's Transcripts <Burrelle@aol.com>
5. Public Review Hearing on No-Fault Insurance, Meyer CompuCourt
Reporting, Transcripts page 25, Saturday, June 10, 2000, Prince
Albert, Saskatchewan
6. Public Review Hearing on No-Fault Insurance, Meyer CompuCourt
Reporting, Transcripts page 29, Saturday, June 10, 2000, Prince
Albert, Saskatchewan
7. No-Fault is not an administrative matter, it is a political
matter, it affects all of us, by Mario deSantis, June 9, 2000
|