"The National Missile defence, or 'son of Star Wars' in the
media smartass jargon, is obviously going to proceed. The new Bush
administration in the U.S. is not peopled with aging flower
children. Characters like the defence secretary, that old cold
warrior Donald Rumsfeld, are not the sort to crack under diplomatic
pressure."--David Warren ( article: Nuclear attack
not fear of past, February 23, 2001)
It was just last week that I discovered and appreciated the work
of John Ralston Saul, and now you can imagine how frustrated I feel
as I read the review of his book 'On Equilibrium' by journalist
David Warren. Warren says that Saul is an intellectual fraud and
that he took the trouble to review his latest book because he is
accepted in this country as a major public intellectual. Warren's
last words for this review are "He [Saul] is celebrated by our
Prime Minister as an inspiration to the Canadian state. This is a
dreadful state of affairs."
I have read some of the articles written by David Warren and I
find his stories too much rhetorical and sometime difficult to
understand as my classical education is certainly not au pair with
Warren. But if I cannot understand Warren's stories too well I can
understand his fractured mind and his inability to understand our
humanness and creativity.
David Warren is the type of man who conscious of not being a hero
himself yearns to follow the heroes who can inspire patriotism, a
patriotism which arises in waging never ending wars against the evil
doers. If we are sincere with ourselves, we understand our realities
as they present themselves and as we reflect on them. We don't
understand realities because we are told so. Therefore, if we really
want to understand the mental reality of David Warren we must refer
to some of his relevant work and reflect on such a work. I have
chosen the following excerpt of Warren's article on leadership and I
wish you good luck in understanding the mental reality of this man:
"...I tend to think now of George W. Bush as having something
in him of Winston Churchill. (The younger Bush chose Churchill as a
personal hero, years ago; who knows what heroes Mr. Chretien chose?)
From the first moments of the conflict, the president knew
what he was about. He gathered in what had happened, the scale of
what had happened. He knew who he was, and what he was called upon
to do. He grasped, as a leader, that this was no ordinary challenge,
that it had become the reason for his life. He did not even look at
polls before he began acting and speaking.
In the United States, a person many feared would prove a weak
president, soon showed the most impressive qualities of leadership,
and continues to do so. He has made mistakes, he will make mistakes,
as Churchill also made mistakes; but he will not lose his hold on
the big picture. He has seemed to rise right out of himself, to
become a giant of a man.
And the American people have been galvanized by this
leadership, they have themselves risen to the occasion, summoned the
will to fight. Even the polls confirm, they will not be distracted
from their commitment: they know they too are put to the test. They
know who they are -- Americans -- what being an American means.
Whereas we are at a loss, we really don't know who we
[Canadians] are, and there is no one who speaks for us. We are mere
spectators in our own fate. We get mixed signals from our craven
rulers..."
References:
Pertinent articles published in Ensign
Personal note: I had a giggle as I reflected on the use of the
word 'polls' by David Warren
The incredible lightness of Ralston Saul, David Warren, Ottawa
Citizen, December 17, 2001 http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?f=/stories/20011217/888663.html
On leadership, David Warren, December 9, 2001 http://www.davidwarrenonline.com/index45.html |