Three days ago my son Rico mentioned that he was considering to
deliver a five minute speech on "System Thinking" as part of his
university communication course. I told Rico that I was very pleased
to hear this and that there is a lot of educational material on
system thinking. As I think about Rico's interest in system thinking
so I recall the satisfaction I received when my other son James told
me in the Fall of 1997 that he was interested in ecological
economics.Today, as we are experiencing the ultimate corruption
of the BIG LIE of the Free Market so I believe that system thinking
and ecological economics will provide the social remedies for
developing better democracies and fairer global markets.
System thinking refers to our ability to understand our complex
realities as interwoven to each other, and this understanding of our
realities contrasts with today's Linear Thinking mentality to see
our realities in terms of singular cause - effect relationships.
Ecological economics rebuffs the exclusive mathematical and monetary
notions of economics and sees economic development as dependent on
our social history and our pursuing of freedom.
Yesterday, I wrote few lines on the ongoing issue of health
reforms in Canada and today I want to highlight our social need to
use our intelligence and therefore use system thinking to address
the root problem of health care.
The root problem of health care in Canada is the linear thinking
mentality of the elitist uppercrust. In a nutshell, to have a linear
mentality means to look at things in a static way, such as when we
make static comparisons of realities without too much thinking. For
example, The StarPhoenix editorial "Kirby report primes pump"
reports that "According to recent OECD figures, the 9.1 percent of
GDP Canada dedicated to health spending in 2000 was lower that
France's 9.5 percent, Switzerland's 10.7 percent and America's 13
percent. Canada's per capita health expenditure of slightly more
than $2,500 US was about half of the $4,600 spent by the US and on
par with the likes of Germany, France and Australia."
My first thinking in somewhat trying to break down this
comparative analysis is the realization that the above comparisons
could not include homogeneous data as such data come from different
social systems; also, the above comparisons neglect to identify that
spending in other public sectors affect our health as well, for
instance education. In addition, the fact that the US may spend
twice as much as Canada in health care doesn't say too much either
unless we qualify the facts that some 43 millions of Americans have
no health insurance, and that the richest one percent of Americans,
whose financial wealth is greater that the bottom 90 percent, have a
propensity to misspend their private money and be ripped off too.
I have no ready solutions for Canada's health care; however,
political solutions would certainly be better if the elitist
uppercrust would be forced to misspend less private money in health
care. This can be achieved by pursuing a more intelligent social
system with less financial disparity between the rich and the poor.
References
Pertinent articles published in Ensign
G. Ossimitz: System Dynamics/Systems Thinking Mega Link List
http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/~gossimit/linklist.php?uk=10
Kirby report primes pump, October 30, 2002, Saskatoon Star
Phoenix
US Health Insurance Coverage. Issued September 2000 U.S. CENSUS
BUREAU http://www.census.gov/prod/2000pubs/p60-211.pdf
Ownership Statistics: Why a Shared Capitalism is Needed...
http://www.sharedcapitalism.org/scfacts.html
Abelson, Reed, Tenet Hospital in California is searched by U.S.
Agents, November 1, 2002, New York Times
|