|   In reading the article "The questions of the HRDC 
			scandal. How can we trust a government that is not responsible?(1)" 
			I was astonished to realize how the feeling of helplessness of the 
			author, Marie-Josee Kravis, is close to mine. Marie-Josee Kravis is 
			not able to rationalize the irresponsibility of the federal 
			government in dealing with the $1 billion dollar jobs program at the 
			Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC). One billion dollars of 
			taxpayers money is grossly misspent willfully and yet nobody is 
			responsible for this scandal.  
			Denis Desautels, the Auditor General, has stated that this 
			mismanagement problem needs "...to be fixed right away...(2)" 
			Desautels' comment raises another question "how can you fix right 
			away a billion dollar scandal which has implicated so many 
			politicians, so many bureaucrats, so many businesses, and so many 
			lawyers?" No, there is no quick fix for this problem, this is a 
			textured social problem and its fixing requires deep 
			transformational changes(3) of our political, bureaucratic, business 
			and justice leadership.  
			Marie-Josee Kravis has stated that "...in an era of supposedly 
			more sophisticated and technologically advanced management systems 
			and controls, the government is unfazed and unapologetic about 
			mismanaging and misappropriating public funds..." Our own majority 
			governments make regulations and laws and yet they break these 
			regulations and laws(4)(5)(6).  
			When will the Police and Justice System come to the rescue of our 
			democracy(7)? Unable to explain how to find a remedy to the current 
			corrupted governmental leadership, Marie-Josee Kravis has stated 
			"...Political philosophers, notably John Locke, have claimed that 
			citizens entrust governments with the coercive power to act on their 
			behalf, for their benefit and for the protection of their rights. 
			Failure to fulfill this trust would, Locke suggested, lead to the 
			loss of legitimate authority. Trust therefore implied strict 
			accountability. To be responsible meant to be answerable..." We have 
			governments which break the same regulations and laws they make(8) 
			and yet they demand "...private corporations and citizens to be 
			responsible for events they could but did not prevent..." Is this 
			the social contract citizens have with our governments(9)?  
			Endnotes  
			1. The questions of the HRDC scandal. How can we trust a 
			government that is not responsible? By Marie-Josee Kravis, National 
			Post, February 11, 2000 http://www.nationalpost.com  
			2. Desautels wants system overhaul, by James Baxter, Southam 
			News, February 11, 2000, National Post http://www.nationalpost.com
			 
			3. Refer to the series of articles NEED OF TRANSFORMATIONAL 
			CHANGES IN SASKATCHEWAN, by Mario deSantis published by North 
			Central Internet News, September to November 1998 http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/authors/desantis.html
			 
			4. THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF BILL 23: Back to work legislation 
			against Saskatchewan Nurses, by Mario deSantis, June 8, 1999  
			5. Rules may have been bent for firm U.S. Company got $1.6M, by 
			David Stonehouse, Ottawa Citizen, February 14, 2000, National Post 
			http://www.nationalpost.com  
			6. Mr. Mackay, Conservative House Leader, has presented evidence 
			of suspected criminal wrongdoing to the RCMP. Stewart deflects 
			charge that she lied to Parliament: Another raucous day, by Robert 
			Fife, Ottawa Bureau Chief, February 12, 2000, National Post http://www.nationalpost.com
			 
			7. Milgaard's $10 million compensation: covering up the personal 
			assets of our policing Saskatchewan Government, by Mario deSantis, 
			June 24, 1999  
			8. Governments must stop to serve themselves and their friends, 
			by Mario deSantis, February 12, 2000  
			9. Governmental coalition in Saskatchewan: a private contractual 
			deal at the expense of the electorate?, by Mario deSantis, October 
			2, 1999  
			   |