I read the article "Proper way to challenge study: more research(1)" 
			by Dr. Barry McLennan, and I laughed at this professional 
			researcher's conclusion that Dr. David Cassidy's study(2) on the 
			merit of no-fault insurance should be challenged with more 
			researches conducted in a logical and scientific manner rather than 
			through the emotions of people. 
			Dr. McLennan's article is a reflection of a reductionist mind set 
			whereby good research people are blamed for the systemic faults of 
			the system, reprimanded, removed from office and replaced with new 
			researchers who take the roles of principal investigators and 
			principal manipulators of their subordinates and of their 
			statistical data. Statistics is not comprised solely of the 
			manipulation of numbers, but it includes the stories and the 
			emotions of people behind these numbers(3).  
			In SGI's no-fault insurance program we have injured victims who 
			have claimed to have been under surveillance for years by SGI's 
			investigators, and we have injured victims who have claimed that 
			their health conditions were reassessed without any further medical 
			evidence. The discretional reassessments of the health conditions of 
			the claimants made by SGI's adjusters remind me of the phony paper 
			medical reviews undertaken by the State Farm Insurance company in 
			the United States(4). And whenever concerns for the infringements of 
			privacy rights by SGI's investigators were reported to the police, 
			the same police said that they could not help because the 
			surveillance was ordered by the government(5). And the many 
			allegations raised by injured claimants that SGI's adjusters were 
			lying to them, prompted claimant Ken Hidlebaugh, a policeman in 
			Prince Albert, to recommend the use of a tape recorder while talking 
			to SGI's adjusters(6).  
			I don't agree with Dr. McLennan's contention to have further 
			expensive researches, here in Saskatchewan, about the merit of 
			no-fault insurance. We cannot have further researches on no-fault 
			insurance whenever we have widespread allegations of administrative 
			wrongdoings and violations of privacy rights by our authorities, our 
			crown corporations and our academic institutions. No-fault insurance 
			is not a research matter anymore, it has become a political matter 
			affecting all of us(7). The future of our province is not in further 
			phony researches, instead, the future of our province is in the 
			education and integral upbringing of our children.  
			About the author: Mario deSantis is an Educator and Economist and 
			many of his articles have been published in the journal Ensign 
			http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/  
			  
			Note: this article was published by The StarPhoenix of 
			Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 
			References 
			1. Proper way to challenge study: more research, by Dr. Barry 
			McLennan, The StarPhoenix, June 30, 2000, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 
			(The text of his comments)  
			2. The incredible abuse of Saskatchewan No-Fault insurance, by 
			Mario deSantis and reviewed by James deSantis, May 28, 2000  
			3. PUBLIC REVIEWS OF NO-FAULT INSURANCE IN SASKATCHEWAN, 2000 
			Spring meetings in Regina, Saskatoon and Prince Albert. Coalition 
			Against No Fault Insurance http://www.angelfire.com/nf/coalitionagainstnf/
			 
			4. Investigation of State Farm Insurance and paper medical 
			review, Dateline, NBC, June 23, 2000; Burrelle's Transcripts <Burrelle@aol.com>
			 
			5. Public Review Hearing on No-Fault Insurance, Meyer CompuCourt 
			Reporting, Transcripts page 25, Saturday, June 10, 2000, Prince 
			Albert, Saskatchewan  
			6. Public Review Hearing on No-Fault Insurance, Meyer CompuCourt 
			Reporting, Transcripts page 29, Saturday, June 10, 2000, Prince 
			Albert, Saskatchewan  
			7. No-Fault is not an administrative matter, it is a political 
			matter, it affects all of us, by Mario deSantis, June 9, 2000  
			   |