We have been writing about how psychology has become the ubiquitous
discipline of scientific researches, economic policies, business and
political maneuvering. We have to thank Sigmund Freud for finally
inventing the mystery of man's existence in the supreme science of
the mind. I mean, what there is more supreme than the mind of people
on earth?
Saskatchewan and Canada have been making gigantic steps in the
pursuing of the well being of their people. We have forgotten the
million year old essence of the sanctity of the individual and we
are now embracing with open arms the new science of psychology, the
science of manipulation of the mind of the individuals, the science
where everything is possible, the science which is the very real
truth of our existence.
The Supreme Court of Canada has recently provided the legal
framework for our political and business leadership to have
psychology as the primary driver of our social growth. Again, I
mean, what there is more rewarding in life but the outgrowth of our
minds? Therefore, in one recent ruling, the Supreme Court judges,
with Madame Justice Louise Arbour dissenting(1), wrote: "Tears
are to be expected when someone finally divulges that he committed a
crime(2)." Therefore, tears, per se, have become an
admission of guilt, no matter the denials of the accused. This
ruling allows the police to use lies and threats to extract
confessions while the accused is under duress, and with no other
evidence but the tears and the extracted confession the accused is
found guilty.
In commenting on the effects of this Supreme Injustice, Clayton
Ruby has stated: "Our values are revealed. They are these: Lie,
cheat, mislead if you must. Ignore tears and repeated protestations
of innocence. But get a confession from whomever you have in your
hands. That's the message the Supreme Court has just sent to police
forces across our land. We're playing with fire(3)."
And Greg Longphee has expressed his feelings in this way: "If the
Supreme Court of Canada chooses to uphold the Crown's use of the
slippery slope that the END justifies the MEANS, we are all in a
great deal of trouble(4)."
And I am appalled as well; Machiavelli's teachings are now part
of our supreme jurisprudence. But we have hope, we have the common
people, we still have the common law, we still have common sense,
and we have Justice John Reilly(5) , Justice Turpel-Lafond(6),
Justice Louise Arbour and many others. And we still believe that the
Truth will set us free.
References/Endnotes
Articles by Mario deSantis
1. Arbour displays Supreme confidence. Top-court judge willing to
go against grain in defending rights of the accused, by Kirk Makin,
October 16, 2000, The Globe and Mail
2. The Supreme Court of Canada: Oickle versus The Queen
3. Supreme injustice: The Supreme Court just said it's fine to
use threats and lies to get confessions, by Clayton Ruby, October
17, 2000, The Globe and Mail http://www.theglobeandmail.com/gam/Commentary/20001017/COCLAY.html
4. Slippery convictions, by Greg Longphee, October 19, 2000, The
Globe and Mail http://www.theglobeandmail.com/gam/Letters/20001019/THLETS-3.html
5. Judge John Reilly is a hero: a reaffirmation of individual
rights, by Mario deSantis, September 6, 2000 http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/desantisArticles/2000_200/desantis222/judgereilly.html
6. Judge Turpel-Lafond's advocacy for common people and for
common law, by Mario deSantis, October 18, 2000 |