The truth is a never ending process, it is the process of life as
scientist Humberto Maturana(1) would say. And as we have been
mentioning all the times, recursively and never getting tired of it,
we find our truth in our patterns of behaviour and relationships. We
want to find a truth about Jean Chrétien's wheeling dealing with the
Grand Mere's affair. And, as we search for this truth and list the
events characterizing Jean Chrétien's behaviour, so we must
recursively ask and answers these questions: Was Chrétien interested
in the welfare of his loyal friends? Or maybe he was interested in
the greener amenities of his golf course? Or maybe he was interested
in creating jobs for his electoral riding?(2)
Thinking recursively is what we understand to be critical
thinking or deep thinking, and you know what our demented
academicians tell us? They tell us that knowledge is a fixed entity,
and that learning is the activity to know such entity, and therefore
learning becomes more of a memorization process rather than a
creative process. And what is funny, is that these same kind of
academicians tell us what the definition of creative learning is,
and guess what? We are being told to memorize it! And so Jean
Chrétien wants us to know the truth, the only truth, the absolute
truth about his involvement with the Grand Mere's affair, and he has
his personal Ethics Counsellor, Howard Wilson, coming out in his
defense. Our deep thinking Mr. Wilson conducts a 24 hour review on
Chrétien's involvement in the Grand Mere's affair and provides his
final judgment that Chrétien has not violated any ethical written
rule, however he has stated that we need more written rules to guide
our parliamentarians(3). Is this an implied understanding that
Chrétien violated unwritten rules of ethics? Again, you, readers,
are going to make your own opinions, just put yourself in behaving
as Mr. Chrétien did in the Grand Mere's affair, in your own
community, and then rationalize how your community members and
police force would think and behave about you and your behaviour.
Let us now turn our attention to the following sequel of events
as we proceed in trying to understand Jean Chrétien's motivations in
his involvement with the Grand-Mere's affair.
The Grand-Mère Inn's tainted affair
Just before the federal election in April, 1997, Mr. Chrétien
announced a $600,000 grant to the Auberge des Gouverneurs hotel in
Shawinigan, even though a business plan had yet to be filed with
HRDC officials. Who approved the grant? The Prime Minister himself,
officials said. As it turned out, the majority shareholder of the
Auberge, Pierre Thibault, had moved to the area from Belgium, where
he was under criminal investigation after admitting in writing that
he had misappropriated close to $1-million from his former partners
in a fireplace company. A second hotelier, Yvon Duhaime, received
$1-million in HRDC grants to expand the Grand-Mère Inn he bought
from Mr. Chrétien, even though his business was near bankruptcy and
he had convictions for assault, death threats and repeat drunk
driving, as well as past hotel troubles(4). As Mr. Duhaime received
part of his job creation grant, he paid $11,500 to René Fugère, an
unpaid aide and Liberal supporter for Mr. Chrétien's riding of
St-Maurice, for consulting services. René Fugère had been helping
companies to get governmental grants in exchange for a fee of 5% to
10% of the value of the grants(5).
In November 2000, the National Post obtained documents confirming
that Jean Chrétien called the head of the Business Development Bank
of Canada (BDC) repeatedly in 1996 and 1997 to urge him to grant a
big mortgage loan to the near-bankrupt Grand-Mère Inn in his St.
Maurice riding. As we have seen in this series of articles, Mr.
Chrétien has played a very relevant role in making sure that his
friend Yvon Duhaime didn't go bankrupt; in fact, Mr. Duhaime not
only got the $650,000 loan from the BDC bank, but he got additional
financing from other federal agencies. In addition, in 1997 he
received $1-million from Human Resources Development Canada (HRDC).
In the next related articles we continue to cover the web of
relationships connected with the Grand-Mère's business and political
environment as more RCMP's charges(6) are being laid against
Chrétien's friends.
References/endnotes
Relevant political and economics articles http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign
The author can provide specific references of the cited events in
the Grand-Mère affair. He also acknowledges the following news
organizations: National Post, Canadian Internet Network, The Ottawa
Citizen, The Globe and Mail, Canadian Press. The author read
articles written by Robert Fife, Andrew McIntosh, Joël-Denis
Bellavance, Peter Shawn Taylor, Andrew Coyne, Gordon Gibson, and
Diane Francis of the National Post; Paul Adams and Daniel LeBlanc of
The Globe and Mail; Lawrence Martin and Kate Jaimet of The Ottawa
Citizen.
1. An 'Interview' with Dr Humberto Maturana http://www.pnc.com.au/~lfell/visit.html
2. Prime Minister Jean Chrétien's involvement with the BDC's
$615,000 loan. Part 1: Chrétien's interest for his friends? For his
golf course? For creating jobs? By Mario deSantis, December 6, 2000
3. Ethics boss: no rules, no foul, Robert Fife, Andrew McIntosh
and Joël-Denis Bellavance, November 22, 2000 http://www.nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/stories/20001122/378868.html
4. The anatomy of the Liberals' HRDC scandal: Auditor-General to
table report on $1B jobs fund fiasco, Andrew McIntosh, October 17,
2000, National Post http://www.nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/stories/20001017/431568.html
5. Fifth RCMP probe of grants in PM's riding, Andrew McIntosh,
with files from Robert Fife, November 11, 2000, National Post
http://www.nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/stories/20001111/366798.html
6. Job grants in PM's riding generate more charges, CBC Canada,
WebPosted Thu Dec 7 09:15:44 2000 http://cbc.ca/cgi-bin/templates/view.cgi?/news/2000/12/07/grant_charges001207 |