Yesterday I read the book "Douglas McGregor Revisited(1)' and this
early morning I read the article "Why the invisible hand has failed
the Third World(2)." What a contrast of imagination is included in
these two writings and what kind of differential thinking is
expressed by the two people in question: Douglas McGregor, a
management scientist, and Hernando De Soto, a Peruvian economist.
Douglas McGregor formulated the well known Theory X and Theory Y
related to the management and motivation of workers/employees in the
work place(3). McGregor presented these theories to open a public
dialogue on understanding the basic assumptions of our human nature
so that people's work could be designed to be closer to our human
nature and aspiration. In a nutshell, Theory X assumes that people
are inherently 'lazy' and must have external prodding to do
anything, that is waving the dollar sign in front of their noses;
instead, Theory Y assumes that people are inherently cooperative,
imaginative and creative. There is no doubt where McGregor stood
about these two theories, and when asked repetitiously the question
of how you would motivate people he would respond "You don't, Man is
by nature motivated." And therefore, the challenge lies not in
motivating people but in building an environment in which motivated
people are willing to make a maximum contribution [Heil/Bennis/Stephens
page 87], for themselves, for their organizations and for their
communities(4).
Hernando De Soto(5) ha written the book "The Mystery of Capital:
Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else". In
this book, De Soto sees the world as made up of poor and rich
countries. De Soto observes that after the fall of Communism with
the disintegration of the Soviet Union, capitalism has not provided
new wealth to the former communist countries and to the third world.
And he believes that capitalism has not been successful in these
countries because of the lack of well defined property rights. I am
very puzzled by this economist's observation, however I am getting
used to the widespread BS coming out of the mouths of our
outstanding leaders, be politicians, academicians, businessmen or
some other experts of human nature and affairs. Now that we don't
have communism anymore, what do we have? Capitalism? And what is
Capitalism? If capitalism is free enterprise I ask myself where is
it(6)? If capitalism is the free market envisioned by Adam Smith(7),
I ask myself where is it(8)? My contention is that there is no point
of exporting Capitalism to the third world as there was no point of
exporting Democracy to Vietnam in the 60s and 70s. And under this
overall political and economic misunderstanding, to blame the
failure of Capitalism in the third world countries to the lack of
well defined property right(9) is not only absurd, but void of any
social intelligence. I am just wondering, instead, if the failure of
Capitalism in the former communist and third world countries could
be due to the lack of Human Rights in these countries.
Notes/References
Quote by Donella Meadows "challenging a paradigm is not a
part-time job. It is not sufficient to make your point once and then
blame the world for not getting it. The world has a vested interest
in, a commitment to, not getting it. The point has to be made
patiently and repeatedly, day after day after day" ftp://sysdyn.mit.edu/ftp/sdep/Roadmaps/RM1/D-4143-1.pdf
The Global Citizen, http://www.tidepool.org/gc/
List of relevant social articles http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign
1. Douglas McGregor, Revisited: Managing the Human Side of the
Enterprise, by Gary Heil, Warren Bennis, Deborah C. Stephens, John
Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2000. ISBN 0-471-31462-5. Gary Heil and Deborah
C. Stephens are coufounders of the Center for Innovative Leadership
http://www.cfil.com/ And Warren Bennis is Distinguished Professor of
Business Administration at the University of Southern California
http://behavior.net/column/bennis/bio.html
2. Why the invisible hand has failed the Third World, Lorne
Gunter, December 30, 2000, The Edmonton Journal http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?f=/stories/20001230/422067.html
3. Business Open Learning Archive. Douglas McGregor - Theory X
and Y, http://sol.brunel.ac.uk/~jarvis/bola/motivation/mcgregor.html
4. Living Systems: Principles of Organization and Building
Sustainable Human Communities, by Mario deSantis, September 12, 1998
http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/desantis8/desantis8.html
5. Hernando De Soto. Interviewed by Dario Fernandez-Morera,
http://www.reason.com/DeSoto.html
6. The assembly line economics is obsolete, by Mario deSantis,
December 26, 2000 http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/desantisArticles/2000_200/desantis295/supplyNdemand.html
7. Biography of Adam Smith (1723-1790), Adam Smith wrote "The
Wealth of Nations." He is most often recognized for the expression
"the invisible hand," which he used to demonstrate how self-interest
guides the most efficient use of resources in a nation's economy,
with public welfare coming as a by-product. However, Smith's belief
in the invisible hand was questioned when at the time of his death
on July 17, 1790, it was discovered that Smith had devoted a
considerable part of his income to numerous secret acts of charity.
Yet, our conventional economists identify Adam Smith as the true
believer of "The Invisible Hand," that is capitalism, whatever
capitalism is for our conventional economists. http://odur.let.rug.nl/~usa/B/asmith/adams1.htm
8. THE BETRAYAL OF ADAM SMITH, David C. Korten (When Corporations
Rule the World) http://iisd1.iisd.ca/pcdf/corprule/betrayal.htm
9. Securing Property Rights: The Foundation of Markets. An
interview with Hernando de Soto, by the Center for International
Private Enterprise http://www.usis.usemb.se/ERT/e19/desoto.html |