"I still think and say that Keynesian ideas about how the 
			economy works and what policies can make it work better are relevant 
			today" -- James Tobin, 1981 Nobel Prize Winner for Economics 
			Our neoclassical economic science based on the concept that the 
			market will find automatically its equilibrium if left to itself is 
			baloney. And because of this misconception of a natural 
			predisposition for the market to stabilize and provide the best 
			allocation of resources, economists have been building statistical 
			optimization models to find the equilibrium of any subpart of the 
			economic environment. In pursuing the solutions (equilibrium points) 
			of these statistical optimization models, our economists have 
			artificially supported a deterministic approach to our political 
			environment and this is why our politicians have been misdirecting 
			and cheating the people in their economic policies, and especially 
			so in the last 10 years of economic globalization.  
			Economy is a social science where the welfare of people is not 
			measured in mathematical or statistical terms. Therefore, 
			mathematics or statistics must be used as tools to help us be more 
			intelligent and creative; mathematics or statistics must not be used 
			to build economic models, per se, to either predict or determine our 
			future.  
			Three years ago I discovered the field of system dynamics as 
			described by Jay Forrester and I understood how deeply important was 
			Forrester's concept that any system can be imagined in terms of 
			interrelated flows and stocks changing over time ( think of our 
			waters where rivers are flows and lakes are stocks; or think of a 
			company where profits are flows and owners' capital is a stock; or 
			think of our human understanding where learning is a flow and 
			knowledge is a stock...).  
			And I know now that we can use the concept of system dynamics to 
			understand our social and economic environment. While the 
			optimization of mathematical or statistical economic models are 
			focused in finding deterministic solutions or equilibrium points and 
			predict the future, system dynamics models are focused not in 
			predicting the future but in understanding the behaviour of the 
			flows and stocks of the economic system over time. Metaphorically, I 
			associate the word 'telling' to the mathematical and statistical 
			models, and the word 'learning' to system dynamics models. And I can 
			say, my readers, how aggravated I feel when I hear the phrase 'I 
			told you so' and how happier I feel when I hear the phrase 'I am 
			learning.'  
			Few days ago we mentioned of the stupidity of our monetary 
			economists who, disregarding the inertia and time delays intrinsic 
			in the economy, want to use the changing of the central banks' 
			interest rates in order to drive the economy and fight inflation. 
			And yesterday, as I was researching on the 'Tobin's tax' as a means 
			to reduce the speculative components of international transactions 
			on foreign currencies, I was heartened to find out this quote by 
			Nobel Prize Winner Economist James Tobin  
			
				"The 'Yale approach' to monetary and financial theory has 
				been widely used in empirical flow-of-funds studies and in 
				modeling international capital movements. Our approach also 
				explicitly recognizes the stock-flow dynamics of saving, 
				investment, and asset accumulation, as in my 1981 Nobel 
				lecture.... Without these effects, macro stories about policies 
				and other events are incomplete. The bottom line of monetary 
				policy is its effect on capital investment, in business plant 
				and equipment, residences, inventories, and consumer durable 
				goods. The effect is not well represented by the market interest 
				rates usually cited, or by quantities of money or credit."
				 
			 
			We must get rid of the speculative interest of our financial 
			environment. One way to offset these speculations would be to play 
			with taxes similar to the one proposed by Tobin. However, a better 
			way to play against these speculations would be to use the simple 
			tool of system dynamics in every facet of our living, beginning with 
			the education of our children.  
			Some references  
			Related social and economic articles published by Ensign  
			JAMES TOBIN, from 'Lives of the Laureates, Seven Nobel 
			Economists' Edited by William Breit and Roger W. Spencer, The MIT 
			Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England, 1986 http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/archive/people/tobin/lives86.htm
			 
			EDITORIAL: Tobin Tax time, Twenty-five years ago, Nobel 
			Prize-winning economist James Tobin proposed a modest tax on 
			speculative financial transactions. http://www.policyalternatives.ca/publications/articles/article185.html
			 
			The System Dynamics Society, http://www.albany.edu/cpr/sds/  
			System Dynamics / Systems Thinking Mega Link List, by Günther 
			Ossimitz http://www-sci.uni-klu.ac.at/~gossimit/links/bookmksd.htm   |