As I watch CNN I learn the language and vocabulary of our
neoclassical minded leadership. I believe there is no better way to
understand the ubiquitous and extremely dangerous neoclassical
mentality but watching the CNN news.
The news are in real time with no time for reflection, and
statistical opinion polls are the guiding principles for redirecting
every day our vision for a better world. And as we watch CNN and our
reality changes every minute of the day so our talking heads and
decision makers use a contradictory vocabulary of certainty such as
predicting the future or supporting others people's opinions with
such adverbs as 'exactly' or 'absolutely.' This is in a nutshell the
NeoClassical Mentality: decisive decisions based on statistical
opinion polls, no reflection, absolute predictions within plus or
minus .99% to 5% margin of errors, and copycatting. And I was
forgetting the concept of 'secrecy' as it pertains to waging wars or
to hiring criminals and unsavory informants by the police or to
intellectual secrets and abusive copyrights.
Anyhow, lets go on and find out examples of our NeoClassical
behaviour. President Bush has the highest popularity rate of any
president at any time and therefore he is directing lawmakers to
"get to work and get something done" for his economic stimulus
package for the benefit of the rich and corporations and have it on
his "desk before the end of the month." And White House Press
Secretary Ari Fleischer echoes President Bush direction to have the
stimulus package passed at once by saying "it is imperative for the
Senate to act... Failure to act will mean our workers are being left
behind." And I say how tax cuts for the rich can increase consumer
spending and change economic lifestyle for the better, and how
corporations can invest their tax cuts at a time of recession when
they lay off people in record numbers. Is this the way the country
is united in helping people in trouble and out of work?
The House rejected the federalization of aviation baggage
screeners and I heard that the republicans didn't want to have
additional governmental bureaucrats who would vote against them. I
also heard republican Rep. John Mica saying that he wants to have
privatized baggage screeners so that the security of passengers can
be assured by the flexibility of having screeners fired for poor
performance. President Bush has stated "I want every mom and dad who
gets on an airplane to feel safe," and republican Rep. J.C. Watts
echoed the president saying that he disagreed with the
federalization of baggage screeners and that there was the need of a
new security package for the traveling moms and their babies he sees
at the airports on a weekly basis. And I say how can we have
security at airports or anywhere else when we have a violent and
divided society as evidenced by the extremely high US incarceration
rate?
I shake my head thinking about the failures of the NeoClassical
mentality (Free Trade), the way we fight international terrorism by
waging a war with a coalition of armed forces, and the way we ensure
our personal security at home by putting people in jail with a
coalition of policing legislation and policing forces.
Some references
Current political events and pertinent articles published in
Ensign
Bush Demands Stimulus Package by End of Month, by Dana Milbank,
Washington Post Staff Writer, October 31, 2001 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17724-2001Oct31.html
House passes air security bill. But GOP-backed legislation will
not federalize screeners, MSNBC STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS, November 1,
2001 http://www.msnbc.com/news/631075.asp
A Violent World and Today's Capitalism: US Airport Security,
Social Inequalities and Shared Capitalism, by Mario deSantis,
October 20, 2001 http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/desantisArticles/2001_400/desantis460/sharedcapitalism.html |