Our neoclassical economists supporting privatization, phony
governmental downsizing, and liberalization of markets are in one
sense fundamentalist economic preachers metaphorically comparable to
the fundamentalism found in the version of Christianity preached by
reverends Jerry Falwel and Pat Robertson and in the version of Islam
preached by the Taliban.
We have the individual responsibilities to be participative
citizens and therefore we must create our own realities through our
own experiences and reflections. As a consequence, we must never
become brainwashed by the fundamentalist preachers we find in the
media, in politics, in religion and everywhere else because of
today's consumerism thrown into our brains by our suppliers of goods
and services: the Big Corporations.
Nobel Laureate Milton Friedman and US Federal Reserve Board
chairman Alan Greespan have been the economists preaching the gospel
of monetary policies to run our economies for the benefits of the
'few and privileged.' In particular, they have been hailing the
institution of the stock market as representative of our well-being
and as a consequence they have been selling the gospel of changing
the central banks' interest rates to prop up the stock market. We
are being brainwashed little by little and we have become now
incapacitated to think for ourselves. The war against terrorism has
diverted our attention to our basic needs of individual freedom,
while our media is telling us about the performance of the stock
market every minute of the day! It is time to wake up and think for
ourselves.
We need to change our financial institutions for the better, and
we must break down this obsession with the stock market performance
as a proxy for our own well being. And we must learn to become less
selfish in our economic life so that we can balance our individual
well-being with the well-being of others as well.
In order to break down the myth that the stock market is the true
proxy for our social well-being I am going to refer to the following
explanations provided by US economist Dean Baker and I urge the
readers to challenge and reflect on these explanations:
***At its peak in the first quarter of 2001, the ratio of the
price of all corporate equities to after-tax corporate profits was
over 31 to 1. This is more than twice the historic average of less
than 15 to 1... This bubble implied more than $9 trillion in
illusory wealth compared to a situation in which price-to-earnings
ratios were near their historic levels...
***It is not possible for the stock market to consistently
rise more rapidly than the growth rate of corporate profits...
***Stock holdings are heavily concentrated among the nation's
richest families. The richest one percent own nearly 50 percent of
stock shares and the richest 10 percent own more than 80 percent of
individually held shares. When the Federal Reserve Board makes a
decision to prop up the market, it is making a decision to transfer
wealth from the rest of the nation to a minority of rich people...
***The value of individual stock holdings are, in effect,
claims against the nation's wealth. The greater the value of these
holdings, the larger the portion of the nation's wealth is
controlled by those who have stock holdings. The concrete
manifestations of this wealth are felt most immediately in the
prices of goods that are in relatively fixed supply: most obviously,
housing. Tens of millions of families are paying more for homes or
rent because the stock market has given a small segment of the
population more money to bid up home prices...
References
Mario deSantis coined the term 'few and privileged' while
analyzing the double talking of the Government of Saskatchewan run
by former Premier Roy Romanow
THE NEW ECONOMY GOES BUST: WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS, by Dean Baker,
October 29, 2001 http://www.cepr.net/new_economy_goes_bust.htm
AN END TO SELF-DEFEATING RHETORIC, by Dean Baker, co-director of
the Center for Economic and Policy Research. http://www.tompaine.com/opinion/2001/07/10/2.html |