"I am concerned that plans to deploy national missile defenses 
			threaten not only current bilateral and multilateral arms control 
			agreements but also ongoing and future disarmament and 
			non-proliferation efforts"--Kofi Annan, United Nations 
			Secretary-General
			Our corporatist National Post editorial board is strongly 
			supporting President Bush's denunciation of the 1972 ABM treaty and 
			looks forward to Canada's cooperation with the U.S. to build the 
			National Missile Defense (NMD) as every other nation is condemning 
			this unilateral move.  
			The National Post editorial board mentions that there are moral 
			and practical reasons for Canada to support the NMD. I disagree with 
			these reasons since there is no moral significance to weaponize the 
			skies and there are no practical benefits in increasing military 
			spending other than increasing the propensity to wage new wars.  
			This editorial board states that President Bush, our champion of 
			liberty and democracy, has every right to use the technology to 
			defend its citizens. Again, I disagree that our President Bush is a 
			champion of liberty and democracy as New York Times columnist 
			William Safire has stated that this president has assumed 
			dictatorial power while other journalists have accused President 
			Bush's business interests in the energy and weaponry industry to 
			interfere with his national and foreign policies. And again, the 
			technology to be used in the NMD doesn't make sense as American 
			scientists have stated that the tests for hitting a bullet with a 
			bullet are rigged and performed under pre-established laboratory 
			conditions. 
			The President states that the NMD system will protect North 
			America from ballistic attack by rogue nations with weapons of mass 
			destruction. Again, the so called rogue nations don't have the 
			sophisticated capability to launch missile attacks with weapons of 
			mass destruction and it would be better for all of us to increase 
			our security on earth by being able to stop terrorists armed with 
			box cutters.  
			As a final advice to President Bush and our National Post 
			editorial board I suggest that the establishment of a National 
			Healthcare Defense would be a much better choice than the 
			overspending in a National Missile Defense as some 40 million 
			Americans have no health care coverage.  
			References  
			Pertinent article published in Ensign  
			Let's get behind the missile shield, National Post, December 15, 
			2001 http://www.nationalpost.com/home/story.html?f=/stories/20011215/876823.html
			 
			Pushing Bush's Agenda using the War against Terrorism: Weakening 
			people and Strengthening Oligarchy, by Mario deSantis, November 18, 
			2001 http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/desantisArticles/2001_400/desantis482/oligarchy.html
			 
			ABM Treaty Withdrawal an Attack on American Security; Statement 
			by the Federation of American Scientists, U.S. Newswire, Contact: 
			Michael A. Levi of the Federation of American Scientists, December 
			13, 2001 http://www.usnewswire.com/topnews/Current_Releases/1213-147.html
			 
			Foolishness on the ABM, Editor Matthew Rothschild comments on the 
			news of the day, December 14, 2001 http://www.progressive.org/webex/wx1214a01.html
			 
			Quotations on Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty/National 
			Missile Defense (NMD) http://www.basicint.org/nuk_00global_quotes.htm   |