"It is error alone which needs the support of government. Truth 
			can stand by itself."-- Thomas Jefferson, 1743-1826 Third 
			President of the USA  
			I have been away from writing about the political and economic 
			scenario of Saskatchewan, but my earlier findings was one of extreme 
			disappointment. I labeled our leadership reductionary as 
			Saskatchewan downsized everything in the name of saving money, and 
			in the process they reinforced a hierarchical society for the Few 
			and Privileged. Lately, we have been dwelling on the falsehood of 
			the gospel of the Free Market, that is the economic environment 
			where big corporations and fortunate sons make money with money. In 
			Saskatchewan, the Free Market philosophy materialized with the 
			gospel of 'saving money with saving money' since there hasn't been 
			much money around. Also, the economic philosophy of 'saving money 
			with saving money' has further reduced the scarce mentality of our 
			governmental leadership who have been supporting their economic 
			policies with the assistance of gurus (experts).  
			We all know how health care guru Ken Fyke wants to save money by 
			having more gurus doing research in Canada's first Quality Council 
			while further reducing health care services in rural Saskatchewan. 
			The scarce mentality of guru Ken Fyke is passed on to his proselytes 
			in government and health administration, and these proselytes, 
			unable to use their scarce mental resources, use the power of their 
			hierarchical voices in order to protect their rhetorical assets from 
			the impending further reductions in health care. So we have the 
			vicious circle of 'saving money with saving money' along with the 
			spiral reduction of services, and along with a stronger sense of 
			hierarchical corporatism which Canadian philosopher John Ralston 
			Saul calls Fascism.  
			Tim Shire, publisher of Ensign, has 
			identified the 'accurate' problem of health care with our 
			political leadership's dogma to reduce governments' size and taxes 
			(privatization). And Shire points out the resulting contradiction of 
			these dogmatic economic policies as the government's size has 
			fictitiously downsized while individual taxes have gone up and while 
			corporate taxes have gone down. And this shift of tax burden has 
			occurred while the Canadian economy has been losing its relative 
			economic growth with most developed countries. Shire writes:  
			
				"Business used to pay taxes, about 40% of all government 
				revenue came from business now it is as little as 10% and when 
				you consider the overly generous government handouts to 
				business, the bottom line is that the business/corporate world 
				pays virtually no taxes at all."  
			 
			Yesterday, Shire and I exchanged some e-mails and he mentioned 
			that we don't need to save money as we need to increase the flow
			of work, that is real wealth. And this is the 'accurate' 
			problem, instead to focus on how much money we pay for personal and 
			corporate taxes we must focus on increasing our wealth by having 
			more flow of people at work. Therefore, rather than preaching the 
			fascist dogma of less government (and more privatization), we must 
			redirect our attention to the wealth created by people as the 
			understanding of democracy is about people and not about the size of 
			either governments or taxes.  
			References:  
			Pertinent articles in Ensign  
			The Action Plan for Saskatchewan Health Care: A Summary. 
			Saskatchewan Healthy People. A Healthy Province. Saskatchewan Health 
			http://www.health.gov.sk.ca  
			First! Define the Problem Accurately, FTLComm - Tisdale - Monday, 
			January 14, 2002 http://www.ftlcomm.com/ensign/editorials/taxReform/More/defineproblem.html   |