Dirty money. 
			With the Free Market, dirty money becomes clean and in so doing 
			it reinforces the spiral of perversion of unrestrained capitalism. 
			We learn today that Enron Corp. donated over $1-million to Prince 
			Charles' charity to help disadvantaged youth. We learn also that 
			these donations prompted Prince Charles to meet with senior Enron 
			executives in Houston and Europe.  
			Reference: Enron Gave to Prince Charles Fund, February 3,2002  
			Enron was the spinoff of the CIA/Pentagon operations.  
			Enron is not an isolated phenomenon of the Free Market. 
			Journalist Larry Chin documents the birth of Enron as an offshoot of 
			the CIA/Pentagon operations in foreign affairs. Former Enron CEO 
			Kenneth Lay was a Pentagon official; influential Enron members had 
			ties with the CIA and with the axis of goodness, that is the 
			Bush/Cheney oligarchy. The California energy crisis was a 
			manufactured Free Market service conceived and delivered by the 
			influential political power of Enron. Larry Chin relates the world 
			wide energy policies of the United States with the ongoing wars in 
			the Middle East and Central Asia.  
			
			Reference: Enron: Ultimate agent of the American empire, by Larry 
			Chin, Online Journal, February 2002  
			
			The issue of the definition of Economics.  
			Economist Marc Lavoie writes: "Mainstream economics is the 
			science of scarcity, the study of the optimal allocation of scarce 
			means... By contrast, post-Keynesian economics is concerned, as the 
			classical authors were, with production and distribution. The major 
			issue is not how to allocate resources but rather how to get rid of 
			unemployed resources and how to increase production and living 
			standards." The application of the principles of mainstream 
			economics is the major culprit of the Argentina's crisis.  
			
			Reference: The Tight Links Between Post-Keynesian and Feminist 
			Economics, by Marc Lavoie (University of Ottawa, Canada), Janauary 
			2002  
			
			Defending the Free Market with military power.  
			The Bush administration will be proposing yearly increases in the 
			Pentagon's spending of some $120 billion for the next five years. 
			The proposal would bring total military spending to $396 billion for 
			the fiscal year 2003, and it would include the creation of a $10 
			billion contingency fund for the discretional use of the presidency 
			against the war on terrorism. The military spending of the United 
			States is approaching to become 50 percent of all military spending 
			in the world.  
			
			Reference: THE MILITARY BUDGET. Bush Sees Big Rise in Military 
			Budget for Next 5 Years, by JAMES DAO, February , 2002, The New York 
			Times  
			The fallacy of President Bush's 'axis of evil.'  
			Professor Stephen Zunes provides a detailed critique of foreign 
			policies as transpired by Bush's speech to the Nation. Bush singles 
			out the 'axis of evil' composed of Iran, Iraq, and North Korea, 
			without realizing that these countries have no ties to Al-Queda, and 
			that unlike America's allies Marocco, Israel and Turkey these 
			singled out countries don't occupy regions belonging to other 
			countries. Bush charges the 'axis of evil' to seek weapons of mass 
			destruction, while at the same time the U.S. rejects calls for the 
			creation of a zones free of weapons of mass destruction for East 
			Asia, the Middle East and Asia and while the U.S. feels free to 
			bring nuclear weapons all around the world with its ships and 
			planes. The speech never touched the real dangers in American and 
			the world such as AIDS, environmental destruction, growing 
			inequalities. Anti-America extremism is increasing in many parts of 
			the world because of the U.S.'s hypocritical stance to fight for the 
			freedom of the world while supporting dictatorships in country such 
			as Saudi Arabia, Sultanate of Oman, Uzbekistan, and Pakistan.  
			Reference: STATE OF THE UNION: POINT/COUNTERPOINT, By Stephen 
			Zunes, Foreign Policy in Focus, February 2, 2002  
			What others say about Bush's 'axis of evil.'  
			Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright called Mr Bush's 
			comments "a big mistake... First of all they (Iran, Iraq and North 
			Korea) are very different from each other," and Nato's 
			Secretary-General Lord Robertson has warned the US it will have to 
			provide evidence to justify any action against Iran, Iraq and North 
			Korea.  
			North Korea has accused the Bush administration of "political 
			immaturity and moral leprosy," Iran's influential cleric Ayatollah 
			Ahmad Jannati has called Bush a "bloodthirsty maniac." Russian 
			Foreign Minister Igor Ivanov has stated "It is unacceptable in any 
			circumstances for the fight against terrorism to be conducted with 
			the aim of achieving one or another political aim concerning 
			specific states or regimes." Iraq's vice-president, Taha Ramadan, 
			described Bush's speech as "stupid" and the al-Iraq newspaper called 
			the US "the sole evil on earth." Most moderate and radical Arab 
			newspapers complained President Bush's failure to mention Israel as 
			the main cause of the Middle East's conflict. The Syria Times has 
			stated "It is hard to understand why the United States prefers to 
			hide the evil face of Israel."  
			References: Bush's 'evil axis' comment stirs critics, BBC News, 
			February 2, 2002  
			Bush repeats warning to Iran, Iraq and North Korea, by Anton 
			Ferreira and Sayed Salahuddin, February 2, 2002  
			Arab states see the at 'slap in face' from Bush, Brian Whitaker, 
			The Guardian, February 1, 2002   |