Three days ago my son Rico mentioned that he was considering to 
			deliver a five minute speech on "System Thinking" as part of his 
			university communication course. I told Rico that I was very pleased 
			to hear this and that there is a lot of educational material on 
			system thinking. As I think about Rico's interest in system thinking 
			so I recall the satisfaction I received when my other son James told 
			me in the Fall of 1997 that he was interested in ecological 
			economics.Today, as we are experiencing the ultimate corruption 
			of the BIG LIE of the Free Market so I believe that system thinking 
			and ecological economics will provide the social remedies for 
			developing better democracies and fairer global markets. 
			System thinking refers to our ability to understand our complex 
			realities as interwoven to each other, and this understanding of our 
			realities contrasts with today's Linear Thinking mentality to see 
			our realities in terms of singular cause - effect relationships. 
			Ecological economics rebuffs the exclusive mathematical and monetary 
			notions of economics and sees economic development as dependent on 
			our social history and our pursuing of freedom. 
			Yesterday, I wrote few lines on the ongoing issue of health 
			reforms in Canada and today I want to highlight our social need to 
			use our intelligence and therefore use system thinking to address 
			the root problem of health care. 
			The root problem of health care in Canada is the linear thinking 
			mentality of the elitist uppercrust. In a nutshell, to have a linear 
			mentality means to look at things in a static way, such as when we 
			make static comparisons of realities without too much thinking. For 
			example, The StarPhoenix editorial "Kirby report primes pump" 
			reports that "According to recent OECD figures, the 9.1 percent of 
			GDP Canada dedicated to health spending in 2000 was lower that 
			France's 9.5 percent, Switzerland's 10.7 percent and America's 13 
			percent. Canada's per capita health expenditure of slightly more 
			than $2,500 US was about half of the $4,600 spent by the US and on 
			par with the likes of Germany, France and Australia."  
			My first thinking in somewhat trying to break down this 
			comparative analysis is the realization that the above comparisons 
			could not include homogeneous data as such data come from different 
			social systems; also, the above comparisons neglect to identify that 
			spending in other public sectors affect our health as well, for 
			instance education. In addition, the fact that the US may spend 
			twice as much as Canada in health care doesn't say too much either 
			unless we qualify the facts that some 43 millions of Americans have 
			no health insurance, and that the richest one percent of Americans, 
			whose financial wealth is greater that the bottom 90 percent, have a 
			propensity to misspend their private money and be ripped off too. 
			I have no ready solutions for Canada's health care; however, 
			political solutions would certainly be better if the elitist 
			uppercrust would be forced to misspend less private money in health 
			care. This can be achieved by pursuing a more intelligent social 
			system with less financial disparity between the rich and the poor. 
			References  
			Pertinent articles published in Ensign  
			G. Ossimitz: System Dynamics/Systems Thinking Mega Link List 
			http://www.uni-klu.ac.at/~gossimit/linklist.php?uk=10  
			Kirby report primes pump, October 30, 2002, Saskatoon Star 
			Phoenix  
			US Health Insurance Coverage. Issued September 2000 U.S. CENSUS 
			BUREAU http://www.census.gov/prod/2000pubs/p60-211.pdf  
			Ownership Statistics: Why a Shared Capitalism is Needed... 
			http://www.sharedcapitalism.org/scfacts.html  
			Abelson, Reed, Tenet Hospital in California is searched by U.S. 
			Agents, November 1, 2002, New York Times  
			   |