"I am at a loss to explain what happened in the UK and in the
US. I think we were overwhelmed by the theocracy of evil in that we
assumed he intended to obtain WMD and then everything that happened
was interpreted with that assumption. It's insane."--Scott
Ritter, former chief UN weapons inspector
DIANE SAWYER:
"But you [President Bush] stated as a hard fact, that there
were weapons of mass destruction as opposed to the possibility that
he could move to acquire those weapons still-"
PRESIDENT BUSH:
"So what's the difference?"--Excerpt from interview
With President Bush, December 16, 2003
There is no way anybody can tell us the truth, in fact, we have
to look for it and find it for ourselves. Lord Hutton’s report on
the death of British weapons inspector David Kelly and on the BBC’s
contention that Blair’s cabinet sexed up the intelligence dossier
claiming Iraq possessed WMD (weapons of mass destruction) has been
released. Hutton’s report has exonerated Blair of sexing up the
Iraqi dossier and has castigated instead the BBC. This report has
been called a whitewash by many critics; we have to make up our own
minds on whom and on what we believe. I find this quotation very
interesting by journalist Anthony Barnett as he comments on Huttons’
report
"Imagine… the government needs to show that Saddam Hussein
is a danger. As the dossier is being drafted, a report comes in
that Hussein might have battlefield WMD he could use in less
than an hour if attacked. Doesn’t this mean that the government
can present its case by saying that Iraq has WMD which will be
used in 45 minutes? If the head of the JIC – Britain’s Joint
Intelligence Committee – agrees, is this not then true? Thus
were the British people informed that the dictator had WMD at
the ready. Incredible! How could any grown man or woman believe
it? But Campbell and Blair did believe it. They wanted to. They
needed to… For most of us to seek the truth is a risk. It is
something we try to discover. The truth is likely to be painful,
to raise issues, to blur certainty… In the Campbell [and Blair]
Code truth is quite different. It is a weapon without a soul or
spirit of its own. It is a device to be used, focused, confined
and disciplined, in order to deliver certainty and support."
I have always been very leery about making truths out of
hypothesis introduced with the analytical notation "if" or when we
"ass-u-me" too much. But this is what has happened with the
manufacturing of the Iraqi dossier in the UK: the hypothesis that
Saddam Hussein had WMD which could be deployed in 45 minutes to
threaten Britain was raised to a certainty, the truth.
At the same time as Lord Hutton’s report was released in the UK,
Dr. David Kay, former head of the US Iraq Survey Group looking for
WMD, repeated before a U.S. congressional committee:
"We were almost all wrong, and I certainly include myself
here. We have not discovered any evidence of stockpiles [of
weapons]."
Again I find fascinating that David Kay is not a scientist but a
Faustian agent who has worked for to the Pentagon, the CIA, ultra
right-wing Israeli ‘think-tanks’, the Iraqi Reconstruction and
Redevelopment Council, and the famous military contractor SAIC. As
the latter business is concerned we have already digressed about its
monetary efficiencies when some years ago SAIC Corporation was
digging holes in the ground to establish the tilting Saskatchewan
Health Information Network (SHIN) in Saskatchewan.
It is a mad world and I find ridiculous that the axis of evil,
President Bush and Prime Minister Blair, have been nominated for the
2004 Nobel Peace Prize, but then we must remember that former
secretary of state Henry Kissinger is a Nobel Peace Laureate.
When are we going to learn that business must not be as usual?
References
Pertinent articles published in Ensign
Buncombe, Andrew WMD: Now It is Bush's Turn to Face Uncomfortable
Truths January 29, 2004 lndependent/UK, http://www.commondreams.org/headlines04/0129-01.htm
abcNEWS Excerpts From Interview With President Bush December 16,
2003 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/US/bush_sawyer_excerpts_2_031216.html
Barnett, Anthony The Campbell [Blair] Code January 29, 2004
openDemocracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-8-92-1704.jsp
Yorke, Thom This theatre of the absurd: Campbell hounded the BBC
simply for doing its job January 31, 2004, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,1135750,00.html
ReSista Who Is Hutton? January 28, 2004 http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2004/01/284545.html
Whitney, Mike Defending Aggression: The David Kay Report January
30, 2004 CounterPunch, http://www.counterpunch.com/whitney01302004.html
Baker, Russ The Definition Of 'Imminent' January 30, 2004
tompaine http://tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/9869
Bowles, William David Kay and the CIA June 10, 2003 http://www.williambowles.info/ini/ini-0105.html
Video clips: MoveOn.org: The White House is trying to claim that
WMDs were never the reason for war. But video of the President and
his chief advisers show otherwise. http://www.moveon.org/false/video
AngryCandy.org Remind Us: Why did the United States invade Iraq?
http://www.angelfire.com/creep/gwbush/remindus.html
Uncovered The whole truth about the Iraq war http://www.truthuncovered.com/home.cfm |