"We've got an issue in America. Too many good docs are getting
out of business. Too many OB-GYNs aren't able to practice their love
with women all across this country"--President Bush ,
September 6, 2004[1]
I have been saying for sometime that president Bush is a laugh,
but as long as he is supported by a large segment of the voting
electorate then he is not anymore a laugh but an extremely dangerous
man for Americans and for any inhabitants of this planet.
Let me not indulge on the shouting speeches expressed by
patriotic politicians at the Republican convention in New York[2][3]
Let me just think on the so called "ownership society"
envisioned by president Bush[4]. The president is envisioning
- tax-free savings that can be used to purchase health
insurance in the free market
- privatization of social security
- tax reform
- furthering the "no child left behind" legislation in
education
- making his tax cuts permanent.
American health care costs are the highest in the world at some
15% of Gross Domestic Product, health insurance companies have
dramatic administrative costs, 45 million Americans have no health
insurance, seniors’ Medicare premiums just went up by 17.5%, the
government debt is sky high, household debt is sky high, foreign
debt is sky high, consumers’ savings are nil[5], and I ask "who can
afford to purchase private health insurance with tax-free savings?"
My answer is that this fake health care ownership would escalate the
gap between the rich and poor.
Social Security is presently a generational transfer of income
from workers to retirees[6]. I ask "who can better invest privatized
social security money in the stock market and offset the related
slumps?" My answer is that the privatization of Social Security
would again escalate the gap between the rich and the poor.
Bush’s tax reform reflect his flat and regressive mentality to
shift to higher taxes on consumption and limit his so called
frivolous lawsuits against medical and business wrongdoing. I ask
"who would be able to save more from higher taxes on consumption?
and who would benefit from limits on medical and business
wrongdoing?" My answer is that these tort reform would escalate the
gap between the rich and the poor.
Bush’s "no child left behind" legislation has been totally
regressive and unfunded. One centerpiece of the bill is the
requirement that states should test children annually in grades 3
through 8, in reading and math, to measure their progress[7].
Educator Deborah Meier rebuts Bush’s emphasis on tests and says
"The special American genius was our inventiveness. That
spirit of inventiveness is what schools don't currently reward.
It's not what you're supposed to be thinking of when you're
taking tests; you're supposed to be thinking of the rules of the
game, not how to break the rules or how to invent new rules[8]."
As far as I am concerned, I must state that this emphasis on
testing, is another regressive educational approach to penalize
different but intelligent children, the ones who have the
inventiveness to break the rules of the game and invent new rules.
Finally, making the tax cuts permanent would swell the deficit
and could destabilize the world economy. It would cost $2.2 trillion
over the next ten years, forcing Americans to give up important
domestic programs or add to the $374 billion annual deficit[9].
Bush’s vision is a sequence of W (dubya), that's the Wrong
choice; that's the Wrong direction; and that's the Wrong leadership
for America[10].
References
Pertinent articles published in Ensign
1. Weisberg, Jacob The Complete Bushisms Slate Magazine http://slate.msn.com/id/76886/
2. Lakoff, George Nailing the frames of the Republican National
Convention September 2, 2004 http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2004/09/02_lakoff_gop3.shtml
3. Carter, Jimmy Letter to Zell Miller: 'You Have Betrayed our
Trust' September 8, 2004 Atlanta Journal Constitution http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0908-10.htm
4. CNN President Bush addressed the Republican Party faithful on
their convention's final night. This is a transcript of his remarks
(pdf) September 3, 2004
http://edition.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/09/02/gop.bush.transcript/
5. Baker, Dean Dangerous Trends: The Growth of Debt in the U.S.
Economy September 7, 2004 cepr, http://www.cepr.net/publications/debt_trends.htm
6. Meyerson, Harold Bush's Game of Risk (pdf)
September 8, 2004 Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3910-2004Sep7.html
7. PBS The New Rule: An overview of the testing and
accountability provisions of the No Child Left Behind Act http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/schools/nochild/nclb.html
8. Molloy, Janice From Students to Citizens and Workers: An
Interview with Deborah Meier Leverage Points Issue 53 http://www.pegasuscom.com/levpoints/meierint.html
9. Sirota, David and Christy Harvey and Judd Legum and Jonathan
Baskin The Progress report September 3, 2004 American Progress
http://www.americanprogressaction.org/site/pp.asp?c=klLWJcP7H&b=181463
10. U.S. Newswire Remarks of Senator John Kerry (pdf)
September 8, 2004 http://releases.usnewswire.com/printing.asp?id=35801 |