Bush's Military Industrial Complex: More wars for Profits
By Mario deSantis, September 21, 2006
In the councils of government, we must guard against the
acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by
the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous
rise of misplaced power exists and will persist[1].
President of the United States (and former General of the Army)
Dwight D. Eisenhower in his Farewell Address to the Nation on
January 17, 1961
Yesterday,
I had glance at the first page of the Saskatoon's StarPhoenix and
saw the pictures of four Canadian soldiers killed in Afghanistan. I
am sad to know that Prime Minister Harper is embedding more Canadian
troops with the Bush forces[2] even though the American 'war on
terror' cannot be won in Afghanistan[3]. I reiterate again that the
'war on terror' as currently waged under the auspices of the Bush
administration doesn't make common sense. And it doesn't make common
sense because the language used by the Bush administration is a
language of war[4], and not a language where we can share
meaningfully our experiences[5].
Over three years ago I wrote that our own neo-conservative war
mongers are inflated assets[6] and I asked the readers to
make some private comments in this regard.
Yesterday,
at the United Nations, we heard an explosive comment against war
monger President Bush from Venezuela President Hugo Chavez Yesterday,
the devil came here. Right here. Right here. And it smells of sulfur
still today... Yesterday, ladies and gentlemen, from this rostrum,
the president of the United States, the gentleman to whom I refer as
the devil, came here, talking as if he owned the world. Truly. As
the owner of the world[7]. And I wonder who is the devil, Bush
or Chavez?
We are living in a spiraling unequal world where the social
forces of politics, economics, business and military interventions
converge. This convergence finds its expression in the establishment
of the military industrial complex, whereby waging more wars[8]
become the governmental business for maintaining and enriching the
military industrial complex[9]. I must reiterate again and again
that governments must not be run as a business, instead we must make
sure that government of the people, by the people, for the
people, shall not perish from the earth. [10]
The convergence of government and business materializes in the
waging of wars under the American pretense 'With US or Against US,'
a pretense which can be raised at any time and for any reason by the
discretionary use of the hegemonic power of the United States. And
in fact 'With Us or Against Us' is a F\false dichotomy[11]
A universal principle of good will for the most powerful country
on the planet is to be generous and sympathetic towards other less
fortunate countries, but this is not the case for the Bush
administration[12].
References
[1] Military Industrial Complex, Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
[2] Fitzpatrick, Meagan "Afghanistan efforts to ramp up with 200
more troops, tanks"; CanWest News Service, September 16, 2006
http://www.canada.com/nationalpost/story.html?id=33f4e491-f5ed-4d7d-b448-44c1f98f483d
[3] Margolis, Eric "Afghanistan: Time for Truth"; Winnipeg
Independent Media Centre, September 19, 2006
http://winnipeg.indymedia.org/item.php?3620S
[4] deSantis, Mario "Bush's Language of War Is Incompatible with
Democracy: There is no such a thing as War on Terror"; Ensign,
written September 13, 2006
[5] deSantis, Mario "Bush's Government: An Unlearning and
Disabled Organization"; Ensign, written September 16, 2006
[6] deSantis, Mario "We need a change of mind: Common Sense
versus New-Speaks"; Ensign, March 10, 2003 http://ensign.ftlcomm.com/desantisArticles/2002_700/desantis763/commonsense.html
[7] CNN World "Chavez: Bush 'devil'; U.S. 'on the way down'";
September 21, 2006 http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/09/20/chavez.un/index.html
[8] THINK PROGRESS "Col. Sam Gardiner on CNN, 9/18/06;
http://thinkprogress.org/col-sam-gardiner-on-cnn-91806/
[9] Wikipedia, "Military-industrial complex"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex
[10] Wikipedia, Gettysburg Address
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gettysburg_Address
[11] Raspberry, William "'With Us or Against Us' is a False
Dichotomy"; http://www.commondreams.org/views01/1014-04.htm
(Wikipedia: dichotomy is any splitting of a whole into exactly two
non-overlapping parts)
[12] Grenwald, Robert "Iraq for sale",
http://www.alternet.org/blogs/video/41878 An extract: "It is quite
shocking
Halliburton is being protected at the highest levels of
government. They are paying lobbyists huge amounts of money. They
are giving campaign contributions. They're hiring former high-level
military people
David Lesar has made over a hundred million
dollars, the head of Halliburton, since this war began - that is an
obscenity..."
|