"What we see now is the tragedy of a great country, with noble
impulses, successful institutions, magnificent historical
achievements and immense energies, which has become a menace to
itself and to mankind."--Anatol Lieven, Senior Associate at
the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington DC
It was just sometime ago that we explained how Bush's foreign
policies to attack Iraq are fundamentally flawed and reflecting a
demented linear mentality to solve American oil problems with
heroic, aggressive and warrisome military interventions.
Metaphorically, this demented linear mentality is the same one
expressed by the so-called global economy of the Free Market as the
International Monetary Fund and the World Bank loan money to poorer
countries on the conditions that they advance their democracies by
privatizing and deregulating their common goods.
So here we have Bush's America defending America's freedom to
acquire oil by military force, and so we have the Free Market
defending the freedom of unrestrained crony capitalism all over the
world.
Bush wants to attack Iraq, but will the eventual defeat of Iraq
constitute a new peaceful step towards a better world? Bush waged a
war against the Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, but is
Afghanistan really liberated?
We have the situation that Osama Bin Laden could be alive, that
acts of terrorism are increasing, and that the Karzai's government
is nothing else but a puppet propped up by the greased Bush
administration as oil companies have now reached their goal to
privately contract out an oil pipeline in Central Asia.
It is my contention that the Bush administration wants to attack
Iraq mostly to detract the public attention from the dismal economic
domestic policies and from the independent investigation surrounding
the 9-11 events. Above all, Bush wants to attack Iraq to acquire one
of the richest oil reserve in the world.
Our problems are complex, and these problems are all
interconnected and dependent on each other. Bush wants to attack the
axis of evil Iraq and solve America's problem of a possible oil
shortage, but then what we find is more terrorism, what we find is
the other axis of evil Iran building nuclear plants, what we find is
yet another axis of evil North Korea resuming its nuclear energy
programs. Bush has not identified Venezuela as another axis of evil,
but has targeted Venezuela's president Hugo Chavez as a devil to be
deposed. In fact, Chavez defends the interests of the poor rather
than the interests of the greasy oil corporations and Chavez has
been delivering oil to Cuba against Bush's interests.
The Bush administration's linear thinking approach to solve
problems as rooted in the axis of evil or in the devil, are just a
cover up for the greasy profiteering interests of the big oil
corporations and the high technology big military corporations.
We cannot solve our own problems by acquiring more oil around the
world and by waging more high technology wars around the world. We
can only solve our own problems realizing that these problems are of
our own making, that is, we must look at ourselves in the mirror,
and realize that our reflective images are our own problems, and
that problems are not there in isolation as the axis of evil or the
act of the devil.
Reference
Lieven, Anatol, The Push for War, Originally published in the
London Review of Books (Vol. 24 No. 19) on 3 October 2002 http://www.ceip.org/files/Publications/2002-10-22-lieven-lrb.asp?from=pubauthor |