"Insurers place profits over people and threaten the
livelihood of America's doctors. It's unfair to ask patients to give
up their legal rights so the insurance industry can make higher
profits."--Mary E. Alexander, president of the Association
of Trial Lawyers of America
Whenever the God of Money takes over the running of our lives in
a world where the top one percent of the American families own over
95 percent of the total financial wealth only the supposed rational
economic explanations of this top one percent are turned into laws
by the sold out politicians and fortunate sons.
We were the first people in Saskatchewan to realize that the
governmental NoFault insurance program was the product of sold out
politicians, the product of a sold out research conducted by Dr.
David Cassidy and his friends, the product of a bureaucratic
Saskatchewan Government Insurance (SGI) corporation competing for
lower forced expected costs rather than for needed services.
We were the first people in Saskatchewan to realize that the
NoFault insurance programs were nothing else but the byproduct of
the Tort Reform initiated by then Governor George Bush of Texas in
the nineties. We also came to understanding that NoFault was a
political and corporative movement preached by sold out politicians
and fortunate sons, and in fact, we labeled our own Government of
Saskatchewan a NoFault government and we have to be thankful in this
regard to the researches and work conducted by Lorie Terry of the
Saskatchewan Coalition Against NoFault..
Today we have journalist Helen Thomas, former senior
correspondent at the White House, echoing our concerns about Tort
Reform and the related NoFault legislative programs. As we defined
the Government of Saskatchewan a NoFault government so we must
define today the Bush Administration as a NoFault government.
The Bush Administration has no fault in turning the United States
into a police state; it has no fault in increasing violence and
terrorism around the world; it has no fault in not providing needed
medications to millions of people dying of AIDS; it has no fault in
carrying out assassinations in foreign lands; it has no fault in
enriching rich people, enriching big corporations and enriching
insurance companies. The Bush Administration has no fault in
anything it does as everything has become the expression of the
private contract; and if the private contract is not enough to
support the welfare of the top one percent of American families then
we have either the military or Tort Reform coming to the rescue of
our fortunate sons.
Helen Thomas writes:
The Bush administration has it in for trial lawyers and is
planning a big push for tort reform... The administration wants
to put a $250,000 cap on malpractice awards for pain and
suffering. It follows a speech President Bush made last July 24
when he claimed that "the cause of the medical liability crisis
is a badly broken system of litigation that serves the interest
of specialized trial lawyers, not patients." Trial lawyers are
used to being demonized and they are a favorite political target
of conservatives... When Bush was governor of Texas, he led a
crusade to make the state's legal system less helpful to
consumers. He pushed through legislation that capped punitive
damages, limited class actions to federal courts and made it
easier for judges to impose sanctions on plaintiffs who filed
so-called "frivolous" lawsuits. Let's have more of that
"frivolity." That is actually a misnomer because some of those
lawsuits led to dramatic safety improvements, forced on
corporations through jury verdicts. Nothing gets their attention
like writing a big check to an injured customer... Bush's war on
the trial lawyers can only please those from the
consumer-be-damned school of corporate wrongdoing. In President
Bush's "compassionate conservatism," just whom does he feel
compassion for? I fear I know the answer.
Have you heard the sweet, calm, scientific, rational and assured
talks of SGI executives and their friendly Saskatchewan politicians?
They are sweet, scientific, rational and assured for whom? I have no
need to know the answer.
Reference
Pertinent articles published by Ensign
Wallace, Kathryn, Little-Known Texas Patron Guided Bush Policies
On Vouchers, Tort Reform http://www.public-i.org/story_01_073100.htm
Thomas, Helen, Whose side are you on, Mr. President? January 2,
2003, Houston Chronicle http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.hts/editorial/1722302
Stern, Rob, Increase in Physicians' Insurance Hurts Care.
Services Are Being Pared, And Clinics Are Closing Washington Post,
January 5, 2003 http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A11340-2003Jan4.html
The Saskatchewan Coalition Against No Fault Insurance http://www.againstnofault.com/aboutus.html |