Learning Stories
by
Mario deSantis
mariodesantis@hotmail.com
“I am a Canadian, free to speak without fear,
free to worship in my own way, free to stand for what I think right, free to
oppose what I believe wrong, and free to choose those who shall govern my
country.” - -The Rt. Hon. John Diefenbaker, Canadian Bill of Rights,
1960
“The whole judicial system is at issue, it's
worth more than one person.”--Serge Kujawa, Saskatchewan Crown
Prosecutor, 1991
“The system is not more worth than one person's
rights.”--Mario deSantis, 2002
Ensign Stories © Mario deSantis and Ensign
| |
|
We live in a mind-boggling world. We have the capacity to solve our
own problems, and yet we do not. The major problem is the push for
the privatization of the public good. When we further privatize the
public good we further privatize justice. The mind-boggling result
is that as we further privatize the public good so we need more
legislation to 'protect' what we have unsustainably privatized.
The American health care system is private, the health care
insurance malpractice premiums are getting too high and linear
thinker President Bush blames such high insurance premiums to
frivolous lawsuits and the related multimillion dollars jury awards.
President Bush has the quick fix of Tort Reform to solve the
malpractice of doctors: a cap of $250,000 on jury awards for pain
and suffering, less frivolous lawsuits, and limited punitive
damages.
Without getting into the arena of the need to progressively move
to a public health system let us review what is happening in medical
malpractice insurance.
The stakeholders of medical malpractice are: insurance companies,
doctors and patients. Insurance companies' interest is to make a
profit, the interest of good doctors is to provide effective medical
services, and the interests of patients is to receive needed and
affordable medical services.
The insurance companies are not really entrepreneurial as they
are now in business to make money with no risk and therefore to make
expected profits; so if their insurance claims increase they have no
choice but to increase their medical malpractice insurance premiums.
Good doctors provide effective services, however as medical
malpractice insurance premiums increase they have no choice but to
work harder and in the process they increase the incidence of their
own malpractice. Ultimately, the patients take the brunt of the
increase of medical malpractice costs as they are victimized three
times, first for the increase of medical fees, second for being
further victims of medical malpractice, and third for having their
legal remedies limited by Tort Reform no-fault medical insurance
legislation.
The Public Citizen organization has conducted researches in
medical malpractice and some of their documented findings are:
- Between 44,000 to 98,000 Americans die in hospitals each
year due to preventable medical errors, according to the
Institute of Medicine (IOM)... The IOM estimates the annual
costs to society for medical errors in hospitals at $17 billion
to $29 billion. These costs include disability and health care
costs, lost income, lost household production and the personal
costs of care. They do not include medical malpractice occurring
outside the hospital setting. By contrast, the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners reports that the total
amount spent on medical malpractice insurance in 2000 was $6.4
billion ú at least three to five times less than the costs of
malpractice to society.
- Twelve years ago, Harvard researchers found that only one in
eight medical errors committed in hospitals results in a
malpractice claim. Researchers replicating this study made
similar findings in Utah and Colorado. From 1996 through 1999,
Florida hospitals reported 19,885 incidents but only 3,177
medical malpractice claims. In other words, for every 6 medical
errors only 1 claim is filed.
- Five percent of doctors are responsible for 54 percent of
malpractice in the U.S.
- Few, if any, malpractice lawsuits are "frivolous." We
estimate that the number of cases withdrawn voluntarily by
plaintiffs was 92,621, ten times the number of cases that were
taken to trial and lost during that period (9,293). The
percentage of claims pursued by plaintiffs to final rejection by
a jury is only five percent.
From the above mentioned Public Citizen's findings it becomes a
natural logic to finger president Bush Inc. as the culprit for the
further deterioration of medical services. The linear thinking
mentality of president Bush is expressed by his simple thinking that
the effect of higher insurance malpractice premiums have been caused
by higher jury awards. We know better, there is more than a direct
cause effect relationship between the higher insurance malpractice
premiums and the higher jury awards.
References
President Calls for Medical Liability Reform January 16, 2003
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030116.html
Medical Misdiagnosis: Challenging the Malpractice Claims of the
Doctors' Lobby, Executive Summery, Public Citizen, January 9, 2003
http://www.citizen.org/congress/civjus/medmal/articles.cfm?ID=8778 |
|
|
|