| "The images you are seeing on television you are seeing over 
			and over and over, and it's the same picture of some person walking 
			out of some building with a vase, and you see it 20 times and you 
			think: My goodness, were there that many vases? Is it possible that 
			there were that many vases in the whole country?"--US 
			Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, lying on the looting of the Iraqi 
			National Museum
 Our world is a metaphor of a metaphor of a 
			metaphor. I can see how president Bush and his neo-uber-alles 
			friends of the Project of the New America Century represent the 
			understanding of a world made of metaphors of games rather than a 
			world made of metaphors of life. Refer to the US domestic policies 
			and you see the metaphor of a game where the rich get richer at the 
			expense of others; refer to the US foreign policies and you see the 
			metaphor of a game where the United States searches world dominance 
			at the expense of any other country.  It was some years ago that I discovered the eventual economic 
			fallacy about ranking and competition, and only recently did I 
			realise the related fallacy of dealing with the economics of Game 
			Theory when we have the choice of dealing instead with the economics 
			of Systems Thinking (or System Dynamics).  With the economics of Game Theory we try to apply strategies to 
			win over our perceived adversaries at any cost as all the gaming 
			parties will eventually race unintelligently to the bottom. With the 
			economics of Systems Thinking instead, we try to apply strategies to 
			win at the advantage of everybody else as all the gaming parties 
			will eventually race intelligently to the top.  The economics of Game Theory uses any imaginable tools to win 
			over the perceived adversaries, and when applied to world dominance, 
			Game Theory uses the power of money, the power of lies, and the 
			power of military force as we have been experiencing for example 
			with the Bush&Co administration.  The economics of Systems Thinking uses instead all imaginable 
			tools to win over ourselves, and when applied to have a better 
			world, Systems Thinking uses the power of democracy, the power of 
			integrity, and the power of peace.  Another world is possible beyond Game Theory, that is the 
			shrewdness to think for the sake of winning at the exclusion of 
			others, and it is called Systems Thinking, that is the capacity to 
			think for the sake of winning at the inclusion of others.  References  Pertinent articles published in Ensign  Zerbisias, Antonia Chaos, or Just a Little Vase They're Going 
			Through? April 12, 2003 Toronto Star http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0412-05.htm
			 System Dynamics Society What is System Dynamics (Systems 
			Thinking) System dynamics is a methodology for studying and managing 
			complex feedback systems, such as one finds in business and other 
			social systems. In fact it has been used to address practically 
			every sort of feedback system. While the word system has been 
			applied to all sorts of situations, feedback is the differentiating 
			descriptor here. Feedback refers to the situation of X affecting Y 
			and Y in turn affecting X perhaps through a chain of causes and 
			effects. One cannot study the link between X and Y and, 
			independently, the link between Y and X and predict how the system 
			will behave. http://www.albany.edu/cpr/sds/index.html  deSantis, Mario Game Theory versus System Dynamics July 27, 2002 
			http://www.ftlcomm.com:16080/ensign/desantisArticles/2002_600/desantis673/gametheory.html
			 deSantis, Mario An exemplified description of Systems Dynamics: 
			Small events can have large consequences January 11, 2003 Ensign 
			http://www.ftlcomm.com:16080/ensign/desantisArticles/2002_700/desantis735/chaossystem.html  |