"The images you are seeing on television you are seeing over
and over and over, and it's the same picture of some person walking
out of some building with a vase, and you see it 20 times and you
think: My goodness, were there that many vases? Is it possible that
there were that many vases in the whole country?"--US
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, lying on the looting of the Iraqi
National MuseumOur world is a metaphor of a metaphor of a
metaphor. I can see how president Bush and his neo-uber-alles
friends of the Project of the New America Century represent the
understanding of a world made of metaphors of games rather than a
world made of metaphors of life. Refer to the US domestic policies
and you see the metaphor of a game where the rich get richer at the
expense of others; refer to the US foreign policies and you see the
metaphor of a game where the United States searches world dominance
at the expense of any other country.
It was some years ago that I discovered the eventual economic
fallacy about ranking and competition, and only recently did I
realise the related fallacy of dealing with the economics of Game
Theory when we have the choice of dealing instead with the economics
of Systems Thinking (or System Dynamics).
With the economics of Game Theory we try to apply strategies to
win over our perceived adversaries at any cost as all the gaming
parties will eventually race unintelligently to the bottom. With the
economics of Systems Thinking instead, we try to apply strategies to
win at the advantage of everybody else as all the gaming parties
will eventually race intelligently to the top.
The economics of Game Theory uses any imaginable tools to win
over the perceived adversaries, and when applied to world dominance,
Game Theory uses the power of money, the power of lies, and the
power of military force as we have been experiencing for example
with the Bush&Co administration.
The economics of Systems Thinking uses instead all imaginable
tools to win over ourselves, and when applied to have a better
world, Systems Thinking uses the power of democracy, the power of
integrity, and the power of peace.
Another world is possible beyond Game Theory, that is the
shrewdness to think for the sake of winning at the exclusion of
others, and it is called Systems Thinking, that is the capacity to
think for the sake of winning at the inclusion of others.
References
Pertinent articles published in Ensign
Zerbisias, Antonia Chaos, or Just a Little Vase They're Going
Through? April 12, 2003 Toronto Star http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0412-05.htm
System Dynamics Society What is System Dynamics (Systems
Thinking) System dynamics is a methodology for studying and managing
complex feedback systems, such as one finds in business and other
social systems. In fact it has been used to address practically
every sort of feedback system. While the word system has been
applied to all sorts of situations, feedback is the differentiating
descriptor here. Feedback refers to the situation of X affecting Y
and Y in turn affecting X perhaps through a chain of causes and
effects. One cannot study the link between X and Y and,
independently, the link between Y and X and predict how the system
will behave. http://www.albany.edu/cpr/sds/index.html
deSantis, Mario Game Theory versus System Dynamics July 27, 2002
http://www.ftlcomm.com:16080/ensign/desantisArticles/2002_600/desantis673/gametheory.html
deSantis, Mario An exemplified description of Systems Dynamics:
Small events can have large consequences January 11, 2003 Ensign
http://www.ftlcomm.com:16080/ensign/desantisArticles/2002_700/desantis735/chaossystem.html |