"And we'll find more weapons [WMD] as time goes on. But for
those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or
banned weapons, they're wrong. We found them."--President
George Bush, May 30, 2003, Krakov, Poland
"I am absolutely convinced with time we'll find out that
they did have a weapons program"--President George Bush,
June 9, 2003, after a Cabinet meeting
Today I have come across the term 'circular logic' which is
equivalent to our understanding of the term 'catch 22' that is 'damn
if you do and damn if you don't.' In his article "Political Leap of
Faith," Reverend Robert DeCicco explains that President Bush used
circular logic to execute the pre-planned war against Iraq, that is,
whenever the United Nations inspectors wouldn't find any weapon than
Bush would retort that Saddam Hussein was hiding them, and whenever
Saddam Hussein would comply with the inspectors' directives to
destroy whatever weapon were found, than Bush would retort that
Saddam Hussein had not disarmed as per the security Council
resolution 1441.
Now this kind of circular logic is the corollary of Bush's
pre-emptive doctrine to attack any discretionally designated
potential terrorist or country. Therefore, it is consequential that
Bush's circular logic can turn into outright lies. In fact, the
selling of the war against Iraq included the forged documentation of
Iraq's purchase of uranium from Niger, the finding of two supposed
mobile laboratories to build biological weapons, and the plagiarized
work of a PhD's student thesis written in the early 90's.
We have conventional pundits who claim that Bush is not
technically untrue, while we have alternate pundits who claim that
Bush is a liar. This reminds me of President Bill Clinton when he
stated 'I did not have sexual relations with that woman,' a
statement which could not be technically untrue by the definition of
sexual relation by some chosen dictionaries, but a statement which
is a lie by our understanding of sexual relation.
So we are left with the big question: is Bush not technically
untrue or is he just a liar?
References
Pertinent articles published in Ensign
DeCicco, Robert Political Leap of Faith June 27, 2003 Liberal
Slant, http://www.liberalslant.com/rld062703.htm
Hauben, Ronda The US Government Case for War in Iraq Based on
Forgery and Lies June 25, 2003 Telepolis (Germany), http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0625-05.htm
Beaumont, Peter and Antony Barnett and Gaby Hinsliff Iraqi mobile
labs nothing to do with germ warfare, report finds June 15, 2003 The
Observer, http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,977853,00.html
Jones, Gary and Alexandra Williams Real Authors of Iraq Dossier
Blast Blair February, 2002 Daily Mirror/UK, http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0208-09.htm
Bryan Keefer, Bryan The strategically ambiguous George W. Bush
June 12, 2003 Spin Sanity, http://www.spinsanity.org/columns/20030612.html
nindy.com President Bush is a Liar http://www.nindy.com/bush/index.html |